
7 key factors that distinguish a high-quality mold investigation or air quality assessment from a subpar inspection
1. Comprehensive Approach:​
-
High-Quality: Utilizes a holistic approach, evaluating multiple aspects of indoor air quality (IAQ) such as particulate matter, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), radon, mold, allergens, humidity levels, and temperature.
-
Subpar: May concentrate on just one or two parameters, overlooking other essential contaminants or factors that influence air quality. This is usually the least expensive option, potentially resulting in dissatisfaction with the outcomes.
2. Use of Technology:
-
High-Quality: Employs advanced equipment and technologies, calibrated instrumentation that can accurately detect a wide range of pollutants at low concentrations. Utilizes advanced tools such as particle counters, photo-ionization detectors, sampling pumps, thermal imaging, borescopes, and moisture meters, to detect hidden mold and moisture issues
-
Subpar: Uses outdated, poorly maintained, or less sensitive equipment, leading to inaccurate or incomplete data. Relies solely on visual inspection without utilizing advanced tools, missing hidden mold and moisture problems.
3. Thorough Visual Walkthrough Inspection:
-
High-Quality: Conducts a detailed examination of the property and the indoor environment, observing HVAC systems, occupant activities, unclean surfaces, signs of moisture and water damage or other factors that could affect air quality
-
Subpar: Performs a cursory inspection, frequently missing clear indoor air quality issues or potential areas of mold growth.
4. Qualified Personnel:
-
High-Quality: Conducted by certified professionals with specialized training and experience in indoor air quality, environmental science, or industrial hygiene.
-
Subpar: Performed by individuals without proper credentials or expertise in the field, increasing the risk of oversight or misinterpretation of results.
5. Identification of Sources:
-
High-Quality: Accurately identifies and differentiates between various sources of indoor air pollution, including external sources, building materials, and occupant activities. Identifies and documents sources of moisture that contribute to mold growth, such as leaks, high humidity, or condensation issues
-
Subpar: Fails to locate specific sources of indoor pollutant or moisture problems, resulting in incomplete remediation efforts.
6. Detailed Reporting:
-
High-Quality: Provides thorough, easy-to-understand reports that include data analysis, potential sources of pollutants, observations, interpretation, conclusions and specific recommendations for mitigation.
-
Subpar: Offers a vague, generic report with minimal details and actionable insights. Often merely forwards a lab report without interpretation or, even worse, relies on verbal reporting.
7. Customized Solutions:
-
High-Quality: Offers tailored recommendations based on the specific findings and unique characteristics of the building and its occupants.
-
Subpar: Suggests generic, one-size-fits-all solutions that may not address the specific issues identified in the assessment.
Author: Justin Gravelle
Date: 2024-08-03
